A little something for the American National Socialists
(ft. union jack):D
I do.
Just you wait until he’s at the debate, and he points to Bill Clinton in the audience and says, “Your husband is a rapist, and you knew about it and you covered it up.” (And he’s already started on that train.) What possible response could she have to something like that?
Here’s something else: Hillary likes to have these canned one-liners, she thinks she’s very funny… She’s not quick on her feet… She’s gonna come in with her little smarmy smirk and have some kind of joke about Trump, and he’s gonna improv some devastating one-liner, and then when she’s rocked on her heels, her instinct is always sarcasm and snideness… So, as soon as Trump hits her back, she’s not gonna have a comeback on her feet, and she’s going to look weak and pathetic.
He’s going to say, “I dare you to say Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism”, and she’ll either obey him and look weak or refuse and look cowardly.
And, this is the one–I’m predicting this one right now. If she has one of her coughing fits on stage, he is going to attack her rapid-fire, and she’s literally going to be unable to speak. He’s going to say things like, “Look! She’s dying in font of us.” “I like Grandmas but they should be in a home, not being president” “She’s weak, she’s pathetic–” and she’s just gonna be coughing the whole time, and he’s like, “Let’s take a break! She needs a breather! This woman is not well.”
[…]
In those debates, he is going to have her in the palm of his hand. There’s nothing she’s going to be able to do.
[…]
Here’s the other thing: just like in ‘08 with Obama/Clinton, it is much harder for him to have gotten the [Republican] nomination than it would be for him to win the general [election]. That was a major, major feat… That’s gonna be much harder on paper than to win the general, just like for Obama it was much harder to beat Clinton than it was to beat McCain. And their strategy is to keep calling him a racist, and, it’s like, the ten-thousandth iteration is not going to do it! You’re going to have to hit him with something else. And he’s so mercurial it’s very hard.
The polls already came out that he’s tied with her in the swing states. He hasn’t even turned his guns on her yet!
The other brilliant thing about him is: wait until he starts hitting Clinton with all these past scandals which they thought were dead and gone, [about which Hillary says] “I don’t want to talk about the past.” Well, when Trump makes an insult, then objective journalists have no choice but to explain what these references are. When he says these crazy things, reporters have to be like, ‘Well, what he’s talking about is this…” and thereby all these old stories are brought to the surface. If he’s willing to accuse Ted Cruz’s father of being involved in the JFK assassination, I am certain he is going to bring up the rumor that Webster Hubble fathered Chelsea Clinton–and, why wouldn’t he? And then they have to start explaining that one.
[…]
It’s going to be a bloodbath.
And here’s the other point: she is treated with such reverence by her cabal–the Clintons are very known for their extreme secrecy and extreme loyalty, and that’s fine. Can you imagine being the guy who has to pretend to be Trump when she has her debate prep? They’re not going to be willing to go as far in their debate prep as Trump is going to be willing to go on stage… Do you think [one of Hillary’s close friends and employees] is gonna even in practice say, “Your husband’s a rapist: I dare you to confront that”? They’re gonna treat her with kid gloves, which is doing her an enormous disservice, but they have no other choice but to treat her with kid gloves because this is someone who you work with, you respect, you admire; you’re not gonna wanna go there towards someone you have on a pedestal… I forgot who it was but when [Bill Clinton] was president, some woman refused to testify against them against the Clintons (she was one of their inner circle) and she went to jail for them. So, their loyalties run strong and it runs deep, and that loyalty is going to manifest itself in pussyfooting around the horrible things [Trump will bring up about her].
And it’s also hard to predict where he’s gonna come from. Listen, Ted Cruz could have prepared for debates for years; the idea that ‘your dad shot JFK’ was gonna come up, this is not a likely scenario that crossed anyone’s [mind], and that is exactly what happened.
-Michael Malice, on the Tom Woods Show (5/12/16)
Bro you’ve been totally right so far. I’m convinced he wins this election.
This gon be gud
Ah, democracy in action - the liberty of free speech! The joys of Liberalism! The sheer hypocrisy of it all
Nineteen eighty four
Whole Foods tweeted about collard greens and suggested people add peanuts to them (which sounds kind of gross but whatever) and black twitter kept going on about how white people are stealing cuisine from black culture
when cultural appropriation gets into food territory i just start loose all faith
But but but, I thought it was all FREE!
And predictably desperate conservatives still reblog this after it’s been disproven.
That’s not “disproven”, that’s Bernie Sanders saying “THAT’S NOT TRUE!” With not a shred of evidence that he’s right and WSJ is wrong.
But, the high prophet Sanders said it wasn’t so. Are you saying the mouthpiece of God was wrong?
I love when conservatives are so desperate as to make strawmanning arguments to try to defend themselves when they’re called on their bullshit. WSJ’s statistics are factually sensionalist.
I love when liberals complete fail to provide evidence for their claims.
I honestly figured proudgayconservative was exaggerating the article, until I read it. Sanders only defense was literally “they exaggerated the numbers”. Lmao.
Eveidently you haven’t bothered to read the article, then (conservatives being forced to run away from the truth, how unpredictable). He explains why the statistics are wrong, why the calculations are based on a misappliance of his proposed terms.
Sanders did not disprove what he was challenged with.
“They exaggerated my numbers”
1st Point“Sanders countered that the Journal didn’t really delve too deeply into his proposals to tax the wealthiest Americans.” 2nd Point
I did read the article, this does not disprove the number. We know Sanders wants to tax the rich, but no amount of taxation will alleviate the 18.5 trillion dollars of expenses.
The only way you can “exaggerate” numbers, are by using the wrong numbers, or interpreting what those numbers mean differently.
The only interpretation that I, and many other Americans have came too, is that 18.5$ trillion dollars is way too much.
He outrightly explains the problem, the fact that these statiitics are based on a single-payer healthcare system. When your calculations are based of an erroneous perception to begin with, of course they aren’t going to be accurate.
You. Are. Missing. The. Point.
Even if the numbers aren’t 18.5 trillion, they are still going to be a record high. That’s not debatable.
LORD SANDERS IS NEVER WRONG.
LORD SANDERS TRUMPS MATH.
HIGH PRIEST SANDERS 2016.
SANDERS IS THE SECOND COMING
Crazy leftist Jewish beta male freaking out over a Christian spreading his beliefs, hurting nobody.
What pure gold.
Pure gold indeed. Notice he called him “goyim” (cattle). Is this not the essence of liberal jewry? I wish i could tag everyone i know. And also altogether entertaining lol. oscarturner25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tfDcyODfUw
“Christians are responsible for slavery” Well isn’t that a load of horse shit. Not only were 40% - 75% of Jews in the South slave owners (as opposed to 5% of Whites) but today they also bring girls from Eastern Europe into Israel to work as sex slaves.
Reminds me of the loons from GTA.. lol
“Dirty goyim…. thrown back at Us”
Yeah he’s a jew lol